AI Growth Stack Model (AGSM): AGSM for Tool Category Comparison
Using AGSM layer placement as a key comparison dimension when evaluating competing AI tools in the same category.
How to Apply
Which AGSM layer does this tool category belong to? This determines what dependencies the tool has.
Score your current readiness in the layer below. If it scores below 7, investing in this layer is premature.
Among competing tools, evaluate which integrates best with your existing tools in adjacent layers.
The best tool is the one that both consumes data from the layer below and feeds data to the layer above most cleanly.
Expected Outcomes
- ✓ Tool selection based on stack architecture, not feature lists
- ✓ Better integration outcomes
- ✓ Reduced stack fragmentation
Real-World Examples
Common Pitfalls
Ehsan's Insight
Feature comparison tables are the worst way to evaluate AI tools. I have seen teams spend weeks building elaborate spreadsheets comparing 47 features across 5 vendors. They pick the tool with the most green checkmarks. Six months later, the tool is shelfware. The AGSM approach is different: forget the features. Ask three questions. First, which layer does this tool belong to? Second, how well does it consume data from the layer below? Third, how well does it feed data to the layer above? A tool that scores 10/10 on features but 3/10 on layer integration will underperform a tool that scores 7/10 on features but 9/10 on integration. Every time. I have never seen an exception in 50+ stack evaluations.
Ehsan Jahandarpour
AI Growth Strategist & Fractional CMO
Forbes Top 20 Growth Hacker · TEDx Speaker · 716 Academic Citations · Ex-Microsoft · CMO at FirstWave (ASX:FCT) · Forbes Communications Council