AI Analytics

Heap

Autocapture analytics — track everything automatically

7.8/10
freemiumVisit website →

Overview

Autocapture analytics that records every user interaction without manual event tracking. Retroactive analysis means you never miss data.

EJ

Ehsan's Growth Verdict

7.8/10

Best for teams that want analytics without engineering effort

Best for: Early-stage teams wanting instant analytics without code

Key Features

  • Autocapture (no code needed)
  • Retroactive analysis
  • Session replay
  • Journey mapping
  • Heatmaps

Pros

  • + No manual event tracking
  • + Retroactive data
  • + Easy setup

Cons

  • Can capture too much data
  • Higher storage costs
  • Less precise than manual

Pricing

PlanDetails
ProCustom
Free10K sessions/mo
GrowthFrom $3,600/yr
PremierCustom

Best Use Cases

Quick analytics setup
Retroactive analysis
User experience optimization

Ehsan's Growth Take

Heap's autocapture is perfect for early-stage teams without analytics engineering. You'll outgrow it eventually, but it gets you measuring from day one.

EJ

Ehsan Jahandarpour

AI Growth Strategist & Fractional CMO

Forbes Top 20 Growth Hacker · TEDx Speaker · 716 Academic Citations · Ex-Microsoft · CMO at FirstWave (ASX:FCT) · Forbes Communications Council

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Heap?
Autocapture analytics that records every user interaction without manual event tracking. Retroactive analysis means you never miss data.
How much does Heap cost?
Heap uses a freemium pricing model. Free: 10K sessions/mo. Growth: From $3,600/yr. Pro: Custom. Premier: Custom.
Is Heap worth it in 2026?
Heap scores 7.8/10 in our expert review. Best for teams that want analytics without engineering effort. Early-stage teams wanting instant analytics without code.
What are the alternatives to Heap?
Alternatives depend on your specific needs. Compare Heap with other tools in the analytics category using our comparison tool.
What are the pros and cons of Heap?
Key pros: No manual event tracking, Retroactive data, Easy setup. Key cons: Can capture too much data, Higher storage costs, Less precise than manual.